It seemed clear to me that Universe had no beginning or end
that we could perceive, and I discovered the lovely word ‘infinite’ along with
all the paradoxes inherent in it.
"Tao gives birth to one,
One gives birth to two,
Two gives birth to three,
Three gives birth to ten thousand beings.”
Whatever you call it can never come close, because
definitions (by definition) draw a line (an outline) around something. Attempts were made to use the negative “Neti
Neti” (Not this, not this) but it didn’t help me much to imply an Absence
rather than a Presence. Nagarjuna
applied recursive logic to this problem…
So when I stumbled over The Laws of Form, the book rang bells
in my head, even if I don’t really understand advanced maths and symbolic
logic, etc. The second half of the book
does attempt to put the formulae into natural English, clearly enough, at least,
for me to get just a glimpse of what a profound attempt to describe ‘things and
events’ can emerge out of nothing spontaneously (or something like that).
"The theme of this book is that a universe comes
into being when a space is severed or cut apart.”
“If there's even a hair’s
breadth of difference, heaven and earth are clearly separated. How do you
understand this?" Hsin
Hsin Ming
No comments:
Post a Comment